The Homosexual Movement in
Massachusetts Schools
On March 25, 2000 the Massachusetts
Departments of Education and Health teamed up with the national gay and
lesbian group GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network) and conducted
a conference for school children and educators. The conference was held
under the guise of tolerance and safe schools. However, as the Parent's
Rights Coalition discovered, this conference was about teaching children the
unsafe mechanics of homosexuality. Following the conference, organizers
denied claims of misconduct made by the Parent's Rights Coalition.
Organizers were forced to concede the truth after the Parent's Rights
Coalition made public an audio recording from the conference, which
substantiated their claims. A free copy of the Parent's Rights Coalition
audio tape can be obtained from the Massachusetts News web page.
Alternatively, if your computer is audio capable, then you may listen to the
following 10 audio clips, in order, to hear the entire contents of the free
audio tape. END
The infamous and horrific “Fistgate”
incident
The following article was published in the May,
2000, issue of Massachusetts News. Soon afterwards, a tape was released with
the actual voices of the adults -- state employees -- secretly made during
workshop described below. That tape sent shock waves across the country.
The story was covered by media in the US and other countries, and is even
written about in several books.
Has the world gone insane when such a
lawsuit could be taken seriously?? Read what happened and judge for
yourself.
CAUTION: THE FOLLOWING
ARTICLE CONTAINS GROSS AND DISGUSTING DESCRIPTIONS. We reprint
it here because it involved state employees and schoolchildren -- and these
actions are still being defended by the homosexual movement in
Massachusetts.
Students Given Graphic Instruction
In Homosexual Sex
By Brian Camenker and Scott Whiteman
Massachusetts News - May, 2000 edition
"Fisting [forcing one's entire hand into
another person's rectum or vagina] often gets a bad rap....[It's] an
experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that
close and intimate with...[and] to put you into an exploratory mode."
The above quotation comes from Massachusetts
Department of Education employees describing the pleasures of homosexual sex
to a group of high school students at a state-sponsored workshop on March
25, 2000.
On March 25, a statewide conference, called
"Teach-Out," was sponsored by the
Massachusetts Department of Education,
the Governor's Commission on Gay
and Lesbian Youth, and the
Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).
Among the goals were to build more Gay/Straight
Alliances in Massachusetts and expand homosexual teaching into the lower
grades. Scores of gay-friendly teachers and administrators attended. They
received state "professional development credits."
Teenagers and children as young as 12 were
encouraged to come from around the state, and many were bussed in from their
home districts. Homosexual activists from across the country were also
there.
To say that the descriptions below of workshops
and presentations of this state-sponsored event for educators and children
are "every parent's nightmare," does not do them justice. It is beyond
belief that this could be happening at all. One music teacher who attended
out of curiosity said that she could not sleep for several nights afterwards
and had nightmares about it.
"Queer sex for youth, 14-21"
In one well-attended workshop, "What They Didn't Tell You About Queer Sex &
Sexuality In Health Class: A Workshop For Youth Only, Ages 14-21," the three
homosexual presenters acting in their professional capacities coaxed about
20 children into talking openly and graphically about homosexual sex. The
three presenters, who described themselves as homosexual, were:
-
Margot E. Abels,
Coordinator, HIV/AIDS Program, Massachusetts Dept. of Education
- Julie Netherland, Coordinator, HIV/AIDS
Program, Massachusetts Dept. of Education
- Michael Gaucher, Consultant, HIV/AIDS
Program, Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health
The workshop syllabus included:
- "What's it like to be young, queer and
beginning to date?
- "Are lesbians at risk for HIV?
"We will address the information you want about
queer sexuality and some of the politics that prevent us from getting our
needs met."
The workshop opened with the three public
employees asking the children "how they knew, as gay people, whether or not
they've had sex." Questions were thrown around the room about whether oral
sex was "sex," to which the Department of Public Health employee stated, "If
that's not sex, then the number of times I've had sex has dramatically
decreased, from a mountain to a valley, baby." Eventually the answer
presented itself, and it was determined that whenever an orifice was filled
with genitalia, then sex had occurred. The Department of Public Health
employee, Michael Gaucher, had the following exchange with one student, who
appeared to be about 16 years old:
Michael Gaucher: "What orifices are we
talking about?"
Student: [hesitation]
Michael Gaucher: "Don't be shy, honey; you can do it."
Student: "Your mouth."
Michael Gaucher: "Okay."
Student: "Your ass."
Michael Gaucher: "There you go."
Student: "Your pussy. That kind of place."
But since sex occurred "when an orifice was
filled," the next question was how lesbians could "have sex."
Margot Abels
discussed whether a dildo had to be involved; when it was too big or too
small; and what homosexual resources students could consult to get similar
questions answered.
Role playing and "carpet munching"
Then the children were asked to role-play. One student was to act the part
of "a young lesbian who's really enraptured with another woman, and it's
really coming down to the wire and you're thinking about having sex." The
other student played the "hip GSA (gay, straight alliance) lesbian advisor,
who you feel you can talk to." The "counseling" included discussions of
lesbian sex, oral-vaginal contact, or "carpet munching," as one student put
it. The student asked whether it would smell like fish. At that point the
session turned to another subject.
"A lesson in fisting?"
There was a five minute pause so that all of the teenagers could write down
questions for the homosexual presenters. The first question was read by
Julie Netherland, "What's fisting?"
A student answered this question by informing
the class that "fisting" is when you put your "whole hand into the ass or
pussy" of another. When a few of the students winced, the Department of
Public Health employee offered, "A little known fact about fisting: you
don't make a fist like this. It's like this." He formed his hand into the
shape of a tear drop rather than a balled fist. He informed the children
that it was much easier.
Margot Abels told the
students that "fisting" is not about forcing your hand into somebody's
"hole, opening or orifice" if they don't want it there. She said that
"usually" the person was very relaxed and opened him or herself up to the
other. She informed the class that it is a very emotional and intense
experience.
At this point, a youngster of about 16 asked
why someone would want to do that. He stated that if the hand were pulled
out quickly, the whole thing didn't sound very appealing to him.
Margot Abels
was quick to point out that although fisting "often gets a really bad rap,"
it usually isn't about the pain, "not that we're putting that down." Margot
Abels informed him and the class that "fisting" was "an experience of
letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate
with." When a child asked the question, "Why would someone do this?"
Margot Abels
provided a comfortable response to the children, in order to "put them into
an exploratory mode."
"Rubbing each others' clits..."
Michael Gaucher presented the next question, "Do lesbians rub their clits
together?"
Michael Gaucher and
Margot Abels asked the
kids if they thought it was possible and whether someone would do a
"hand-diagram" for the class. No one volunteered, but a girl who looked
about 15 or 16 then stepped up to the board and drew a three foot high
vagina and labeled each of the labia, the clitoris, and "put up inside the
'G'-spot." While drawing, Michael Gaucher told her to use the "pink" chalk,
to which
Margot
Abels responded, "Not everyone is pink, honey." All of the
children laughed.
After the chalk vagina was complete, the
children remarked on the size of the "clit," and the presenters stated that
that was a gifted woman. Then
Margot Abels informed
all of the young girls that, indeed, you can rub your "clitori" together,
either with or without clothes and "you can definitely orgasm from it."
Michael Gaucher told the kids that "there is a name for this: tribadism,"
which he wrote on the board and told one girl who looked about 14 to "bring
that vocabulary word back to Bedford." Julie Netherland informed the
children that it wasn't too difficult because, "When you are sexually
aroused, your clit gets bigger."
"Should you spit after you suck another boy
(or a man)?"
Michael Gaucher read the following from a card: "Cum and calories: Spit
versus swallow and the health concerns." Gaucher informed the children that
although he didn't know the calorie count of male ejaculation, he has "heard
that it's sweeter if people eat celery." He then asked the boys, "Is it rude
not to swallow?" Many of the high school boys mumbled "No," but one about
the age of 16 said emphatically, "Oh no!" One boy, again about the age of
16, offered his advice on avoiding HIV/AIDS transmission while giving oral
sex by not brushing your teeth or eating course food for four hours before
you "go down on a guy," "because then you probably don't want to be
swallowing cum."
Another question asked was whether oral sex was
better with tongue rings. A 16-year-old student murmured, "Yes," to which
all of the children laughed. Michael Gaucher said, "There you have it" and
stated something to the effect that the debate has ended.
Use a condom? It's your decision, really.
One often hears that there is an aggressive
HIV/AIDS prevention campaign, but the session ran 55 minutes before the
first mention of "protection" and safer sex came. In the context of the
"safer sex" discussion, however, it was pointed out that these children
could make an "informed decision" not to use a condom. Outside in the
conference hall, the children could easily obtain as many condoms, vaginal
condoms and other contraceptive devices as they wished from various
organizations which distribute such.
Well, yes...it really is about sex!
Another popular session was presented by the same three public employees in
their professional capacity and was called, "Putting the 'Sex' Back Into
Sexual Orientation: Classroom Strategies for Health & Sexuality Educators."
The workshop included:
What does it mean to say "being gay, lesbian
and bisexual isn't about sex?...How can we deny that sexuality is central
for all of us? How do we learn to address the unique concerns of queer
youth?...This workshop is for educators to examine strategies for
integrating sexuality education and HIV prevention content specific to gay,
lesbian and bisexual students into the classroom and GSA's....additional
strategies will be discussed."
The three presenters now assumed the task of
teaching teachers how to facilitate discussions about "queer sex" with their
students.
Tired of denying it
Margot Abels
opened by telling the room full of teachers (and two high school students),
"We always feel like we are fighting against people who deny publicly, who
say privately, that being queer is not at all about sex... We believe
otherwise. We think that sex is central to every single one of us and
particularly queer youth."
Margot Abels, Julie
Netherland and Michael Gaucher reviewed a few "campaigns" that have been
used to demonstrate to queer youth how to best "be safe" while still
enjoying homosexual sex.
The campaign, "Respect yourself, protect
yourself," was thought to be good in getting the message to kids that they
should use protection, but since it made children who didn't protect
themselves feel bad, it ultimately was a poor message. Michael Gaucher
pointed out that children "with an older partner that they are not feeling
they can discuss things with, does that mean that they don't respect
themselves?"
The campaign, "No sex, no problem," was
ridiculed, as the campaign assumed that children could opt not to have sex.
Additionally, the campaign made those children who had already had sex feel
bad or think they had a problem, since they had had sex.
After reviewing a few of the campaigns,
Margot Abels
described the project she works on. The "Gay/Straight Alliance HIV Education
Project" goes to five different schools each year conducting up to eight
"HIV prevention sessions" in that school's gay club. These same presenters
who just told a group of children how to properly position their hands for
"fisting" were now telling a room full of educators that they would visit
their schools and conduct the same workshops for their students.
An enormous amount of very disturbing material
was distributed at the conference. Much of it encourages young children to
become actively engaged in homosexual activities. The Sidney Borum Community
Health Center table was giving out a cassette sized "pocket sex" kit, which
included two condoms, two antiseptic "moist" towelettes, and six bandages,
which were for "when the sex got really rough," according to the high school
volunteer behind the desk. There was a supply of condoms supplied by both
Sidney Borum and Planned Parenthood, all of which were for the taking.
Children as young as 12 or 13 participating and receiving "information" and
materials.
But most shocking of all was that there was an
eerie sense of solidarity in the air, against "those bigots who would stop
our progress."
Soon afterward the above took place, the three
state employees were fired by the Department of Education.
The homosexual movement responded by
immediately initiating a lawsuit against Brian Camenker, Scott Whiteman, and
Parents Rights Coalition, claiming that they had violated an obscure and
antiquated Massachusetts wiretapping law and seeking monetary damages. The
"Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders" (GLAD) — the same state-funded
group that won the Goodridge same-sex "marriage" case — went right into
action.
A few months later, Margot Abels, one of the
fired instructors, managed to get an arbitrator to reinstate her job. She
didn't take her job back, but instead initiated her own lawsuit to collect
damages.
The GLAD lawsuit was settled in 2005, when GLAD
essentially abandoned the case, and allowed Camenker to distribute the tape
with no restrictions. The Abels case lay dormant for nearly five years, and
everyone had the impression she had simply left the state and had no
intention of pursuing it further.
SOURCE:
http://massresistance.org/docs/issues/fistgate/massnews.html
END
Woe Unto America's Children!
It is a shame and tragic that little school
children are being
indoctrinated into believing that homosexuality is good
and acceptable; but they are not taught the truth. The Bible is God's Word,
which condemns all forms of lesbianism, homosexuality, cross-dressing,
transgender (sex change) and same-sex marriage.
Read what some left-wing sicko public school
teacher did in California...
A
California school system refuses to say what action, if any, it will
take after it received complaints about a
kindergarten teacher who encouraged her students to sign "pledge cards"
in support of gays.
During a celebration of National Ally Week, Tara Miller, a teacher at
the Faith Ringgold School of Arts and Science in Hayward, Calif., passed
out cards produced by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network to
her class of kindergartners.
The cards asked signers to be "an ally" and to pledge to "not use
anti-LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) language or slurs;
intervene, when I feel I can, in situations where others are using
anti-LGBT language or harassing other students and actively support
safer schools efforts."
The school has acknowledged that the exercise was not appropriate for
kindergartners.
Parent Adela Voelker, who declined to be interviewed in depth for this
report, said she was furious when she found her child's signature on one
of the cards. She said she contacted a non-profit legal defense
organization specializing in parents' rights.
Meanwhile, a school board member, Jeff Cook, says some type of action
should be taken.
"We have a general rule that all instruction should be age appropriate,
and this clearly was not," said Cook, who has served on the school board
for five years.
SOURCE:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,445865,00.html
A
WORD OF CAUTION TO PARENTS: These audio clips contain graphic sexual
language and are not appropriate for children.
